|
© Copyright by Paul Trummel 1992-2010. All rights reserved. |
Updated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
NUJ Cabal - From each according to their inabilities, to each according to their greed. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) formed a non-profit corporation then built and later refurbished Council House (CH), Seattle, Washington. The corporation rents independent-living apartments to senior citizens. The building does not classify as a nursing home and may not legally house vulnerable adults. [Council House] A faith-based organization, NCJW Seattle satisfies its own values to the detriment of its tenants. It knowingly employs bigoted non-Jewish staff members who racially discriminate against non-Zionist tenants. As straw men, those staff members obtain charitable grants and government funds then the directors launder them to support illegal Zionist agendas in Israel: a ploy that distances the directors from unlawful acts committed in their behalf. Tenants who live at Council House legally possess all their faculties and have the ability to act independently. They rent apartments in a block governed by landlord/tenant laws. The difference between those tenants and other landlord/tenant relationships lies only in economic disadvantage and age eligibility not physical or mental disability. The directors employed Stephen A Mitchell, a ravening sociopath and out-of-work actor as director and administrator. He holds responsibility for three homicides by abuse and the attempted murder of a vulnerable adult. Mitchell allowed Islamic terrorist sympathizers to download bomb-making and other terrorist literature on Council House computers. [Tall Structure Terror] Council House attorney Richard R Beresford with attorney/directors Donald G Cohan and Bradley K Spear, granted Mitchell impunity and have since covered up his crimes by bribing witnesses to move out-of-state. CH continues to employ Mitchell (confined to his office and relieved of all administrative duties) to negotiate charitable grants. No homicide has occurred at CH since his confinement although he has never been charged for alleged multiple homicide, perjury, and subornation that he committed. [Conspiracy 2001] [Conspiracy 2002]
The journalist reported the incidents to CH directors, US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Seattle Office of Civil Rights who did nothing about the abuse; instead, they terrorized the journalist. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) acknowledged the report but evidently took no action on the complaint. Knowing of submission of the complaints to government authorities, CH retaliated by sending the journalist to jail with solitary confinement and denied him legal representation or a trial. On appeal, nine Washington State supreme court judges unanimously ruled in the journalist’s favor. [Washington Supreme Court] CH Directors, WSBA, UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and International Federation of Journalists (including National Union of Journalists UK) have neither addressed professional misconduct and dereliction by their members nor made reparations to the journalist despite the supreme court decision. [CH Directors] [Perjurers] Convening a public inquiry and a hearing before the European Court of Human Rights into the issues reported on this web site have become essential for the public good. The public and organisations must have an opportunity to make written submissions and listen to oral evidence. The conclusions of an inquiry in the form of a written report remain essential to democracy. An independent hearing will make recommendations to improve the quality of government or management of public organisations in the future. It is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. [Public Inquiry] Fraudulent Denial of NUJ Member Services Judge James A Doerty, Washington Superior Court (Seattle) claimed that interviews by journalists with willing sources defined as harassment and that news gathering constituted illegal surveillance and stalking then jailed Paul Trummel, a long-standing National Union of Journalists member (then approaching seventy years of age) without trial or legal counsel in violation of international law. [Kafkaesque Experiences] The London-born journalist could not comply with an ambiguous and illegal catch-22: a court order with impossible consequences which allowed Doerty to place a prior restraint on free speech. Doerty ordered removal of EU hosted web sites that exposed homicide, terrorism, and elder abuse. [Censored Articles] With full knowledge of the imminent jailing, Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary and Claire S Kirby (then NUJ in-house solicitor) neglected to act under Human Rights Act 1998, Vienna Convention, and European human and civil rights laws by delaying and denying solidarity. They later refused services guaranteed by NUJ Rules and Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. By providing extensive support and legal representation to at least six other members (and nonmembers) in similar cases during the same period, they committed a series of discriminatory acts. [Solidarity] [Solidarity Statements]
David C Broom, British Consul (Seattle) colluded with Doerty to ratchet up coercion which allowed Doerty to transfer the Journalist to incommunicado solitary confinement among murderers and rapists. The Journalist languished in jail for 111 days of an indeterminate sentence and experienced several near-death experiences before release on a writ similar to habeas corpus. [Metamorphosis] [Doerty Poster] Timothy R Gopsill, Editor, Journalist (NUJ magazine) orchestrated a seven-year, media blackout to cover up the neglect by Dear and Kirby which prevented NUJ members from knowing about the case and providing their support. Gopsill also invoked an illegal prior restraint with British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and Press Gazette. Baroness Buscombe, Chairman and Tim Toulmin, Director, Press Complaints Commission (PCC) stonewalled complaints filed against NUJ, BBC, and Press Gazette. Those complaints alleged collusion and illegal prior restraint for political expedience. Five international media and civil rights amicus curiae argued the case in Washington Supreme Court. In a unanimous finding by nine judges, supreme court reversed all Doerty’s decisions which absolved the Journalist of wrongdoing. [Washington Supreme Court]
Dear and Roy Martin Mincoff (present NUJ in-house solicitor), while feigning solidarity, colluded in a cover up of HM Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dereliction by negotiating a £262,000.00 quid pro quo in a distinct conflict of interest with Gareth R Thomas MP (Harrow West), former Minister of State, Department for International Development (the Journalist’s MP) and Jack Straw MP, former Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor. [Quid Pro Quo] [John Pilger - New Statesman] [The Journalist] Dear and Mincoff aided and abetted Ronald A Johnson (an Internet terrorist) by deliberately not providing promised NUJ assistance to obtain a court restraining order against Internet denial-of-service attacks. Informed of the attacks on a daily basis, NUJ deliberately allowed the vandalism to continue. Since January 2008, systems and equipment repair exceeded £0.5 million which does not include inestimable collateral publishing damage. Metropolitan Police investigated the attacks used for electronic prior restraint and FBI received frequent reports. Six Internet denial-of-service (DoS) attacks occurred (24-30 Oct 09) since publication of an article by Dominic Ponsford, Editor, Press Gazette commenting on election content disseminated by Mark Watts. Ponsford generated heated argument by NUJ officials, officers, and members. Some of those comments linked to NUJ Club JournoScam web site. [Press Gazette] Sources have determined that NUJ officials negotiated with a hacker to effect this prior restraint. Damage that followed publication of the Press Gazette article cost £5,500.00 which does not take into account publishing losses which continue to accrue. The hacker repeated the web vandalism at 24-hour intervals which cost £1,000.00 each time to repair. Total damage now amounts to £10,500.00. The hacker ratcheted up coercion by specifically deleting pages and reference data from NUJ Club JournoScam that dealt with the election of the Journalist editor. That vandalism necessitated reprogramming. Metropolitan Police, Computer Fraud Unit and Federal Bureau of Investigation have received details. The Law Society, Legal Complaints Service (LCS) found probable cause that Kirby and Mincoff committed professional misconduct and initiated action by Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). Meanwhile, Mincoff abused LCS resolution processes by providing false and misleading information. [Mincoffs Flying Circus] David Cockburn, Certification Office for Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations delayed investigation and adjudication of two complaints against National Union of Journalists (NUJ) for five months through illegal stonewalling. By that, he effectively granted NUJ officers and officials impunity to extend a seven-year pattern of illegal activity for another year. [Certification Officer] NUJ has effectively bankrupted its member through barratry, dereliction, and denial of member services. If Jeremy Dear, NUJ General Secretary; Michelle Stanistreet, Deputy General Secretary; and other officials and officers of National Union of Journalists rendered the support and legal services that members pay them to provide, then this web site would not exist. Instead, they denied due process to members and involved themselves in political splinter groups, primarily NUJ-Left. They have run external political campaigns to support extremist groups to the detriment of member services in violation of NUJ rules and laws governing trade unions. By that, they have repeatedly violated their duty of care to NUJ members. NUJ officials and staff must maintain a high-level duty of care which means that they must not commit any act that could harm members. If they do not satisfactorily meet that standard, then they have a legal obligation to consider those adversely affected by acts or omissions and to make reparation. That obligation forms part of the fiduciary duty owed by all trade union officials and their staff to members. The standard that they maintain must reach at least the level of responsibility that a sensible person upholds. They must also exercise reasonable care to protect member interests from harm by others. The term “duty of care” has fiduciary significance and wide legal interpretation for trade unions. In particular, it describes an obligation imposed by law (tort in UK or delict in Scotland) which applies to NUJ officials and staff. Those laws require conduct and consideration which insures that members do not suffer from wrongdoing or unjust actions. Officials must not by law violate member rights through willful blindness or negligence. Referrals to police in several jurisdictions allege criminal activity under: Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; Solicitors' Code of Conduct 2007; Solicitors Act 1974; Administration of Justice Act 1985; Courts and Legal Services Act 1990; Fraud Act 2006; Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006; Vienna Convention on Consular Relations; and, Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Those investigations involve an alleged pattern or practice of illegal or criminal activity by: National Union of Journalists (NUJ) officials, lawyers, and staff; National Executive Council (NEC) officers; also, London Freelance Branch and Glasgow Branch officers. Strathclyde Police assigned an Inspector to conduct initial investigations into the allegations contained in an incident referral (15 Jun 10). Metropolitan Police confirmed assignment of a Detective Chief Inspector to investigate the most recent incident referral (25 Jun 10). Both referrals cite NUJ officials and staff for alleged crimes. [A Patent Stitch-up]
NUJ officials filed new criminal allegations against the member (28 Jun 10) according to Metropolitan Police (Camden) officers. False and malicious, the allegations exposed the member to risk of arrest, imprisonment pending trial, and possible wrongful conviction and sentence. By that, NUJ attempted either to preempt or to evade police investigation of the criminal referrals already recorded against them, thereby perverting the course of justice. An NUJ officer followed-up with this threat of grievous bodily harm. [The Plod Thickens]
Adverse comments, all verified and validated to insure accurate reporting, meet legal requirements. Hover and Click Club JournoScam menu at the head of each page for published articles also new articles and updates. Download free Mozilla Firefox browser and Adobe Acrobat reader from View menus. Readers should consider all articles as work in progress. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||