© Copyright by Paul Trummel 1992-2013. All rights reserved.

Updated 21-Oct-2013 20:46
 
 
 
     
The Grim Reapers - Retroactive Preemption and Stitch-Up

Chester & District Housing Trust Limited “The Trust”
John Denny, Chief Executive
The Grim Reapers - Retroactive Preemption and Stitch-Up

Chester & District Housing Trust Limited “The Trust”
John Denny, Chief Executive

This case study describes one of several attempts by Trust executive directors and managers maliciously to incriminate the Tenant by using kill-the-messenger strategies to silence him and cover up their illegal activity. By that, they have caused the Tenant to live in a virtually uninhabitable flat and left him without heat and hot water for twelve months including the coldest time of the year. They have denied that a problem exists and neglected to stop carbon monoxide and other noxious fumes entering from other flats for sixteen months.

Section 37 of the Health & Safety Offences Act 2008 allows for the prosecution of any director, executive director or manager of the Trust (or anyone acting in that capacity) where a health and safety offence is committed. This provision targets executive directors and managers who ignore or close their eyes to health and safety risks affecting tenants that they have a duty of care to address in accordance with law. [Duty of Care]

All Trust correspondence and actions that reference appointments for gas appliance inspections at the subject flat (since 20 Aug 11) form part of the retroactive preemption scam that prevented inspection by independent structural and gas engineers. That scam included bizarre attempts, allegedly orchestrated by Knight, to manufacture evidence with intent to displace Trust negligence and malfeasance onto the Tenant. [Retroactive Preemption]

nota bene

The Tenant reviewed this report (25 Nov 12) three months after publishing it. CDHT has neither made any attempt to repair the property nor mitigate the damage. Instead, the Trust has deliberately left the Tenant without radiator heat and hot water in a flat riddled with noxious gases for 15 months which includes two winters with below zero temperatures. Twenty months have elapsed since the Tenant reported (30 Mar 11) serious emission problems into the flat from other flats allegedly through structural carbonation. The Trust has used various strategies to evade its responsibility to inspect the property which should have occurred within 48 hours.

Although Stephen J Mosley MP (Conservative Chester) has no authority over Council administrative or legal proceedings, he has quoted his psychopathic consort Paul Knight, Assistant Director of Performance and Income, Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd. about issues in evidence pending an appellate hearing. Knight continues his attempt to evade his responsibility to address serious carbon monoxide and other noxious gas emissions in Trust properties by trying to delay justice then deny it.

Knight has now evidently enlisted the help of Mosley (the Cheshire Phat Cat) who sent the following disinformation (backdated to 04 Apr 12) to evade his responsibility to act on constituent issues:

I have spoken to CDHT today and understand from them that your complaint with them has been taken through to Stage 2 in their complaints procedure involving a hearing which you did not attend. They have also been investigated by their regulators, the Tenants Services Authority and by the Health and Safety Executive who found no evidence of non-compliance on behalf of the Trust. Cheshire West and Chester Council have also investigated your complaint and have found no evidence to support your claims.
[Kangaroo Court - Robert J Thompson] [Code of Conduct Complaint]

Mosley used absolute lies by a proven pathological liar to insinuate himself into matters that did not concern him. He tried to intimidate the Tenant to detract from a public inquiry into associated issues which he delayed for more than a year. By that, he allegedly perverted the course of justice.
[Public Inquiry] [Vienna Convention]

Retroactive Preemption

The Trust sabotaged professional investigation of negligence and withheld evidence intended for use at a Stage Two complaint hearing. An expert inspection would have disclosed widespread violation of Health and Safety laws that has left thousands of Trust tenants at risk of carbon monoxide poisoning: an opinion reinforced by a BBC Special Report (13 Mar 12). [BBC Special Report]

  The Gas Saboteurs  
  Stuart Crosthwaite, Business Assurance Manager, Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd. Paul Finch, Assistant Director of Major Works and New Business, Chester & District Housing Trust http://contracabal.com/Graphics/Jones-P-11.jpg Paul Knight, Assistant Director of Performance and Income, Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd.  
  Crosthwaite Finch Jones-P Knight  

 

  Disingenuous
   
  Heritage  

The Tenant reported carbon monoxide and other noxious emissions entering his flat from other flats (31 Mar 11). Karen Heritage, Performance & Quality Team insolently denied access to gas maintenance services. She acknowledged the complaint by telephone and (without an inspection by a qualified technician) denied that a problem existed. She said that the tenant must have imagined the problem and that the fumes must have exited from the open windows of other flats and entered the Tenant’s flat (through open windows in subzero temperatures). After rebuff by the Tenant, she made fatuous excuses about the rights of other tenants to cause carbon monoxide and other emissions.

Heritage evaded her responsibility to address the complaint and arrange inspection and repairs by a qualified gas technician as required by health and safety regulations. The Tenant has had to confine himself to the bedroom and has not had use of the living and kitchen areas of the two-bedroom flat. He had to cook his food in a microwave in the passage outside the bathroom for almost seventeen months. By that, Heritage arguably breached the Tenant’s lease also human rights when one takes into consideration his age (80 next birthday) and revisions to several laws that recently came into effect (01 Jan 12).

The Tenant filed a Stage Two Complaint with John Denny, Chief Executive CDHT (27 Oct 11) which stated that the time had expired for Wendy Garwood, Satisfaction and Complaints Officer to satisfy herself that a thorough investigation of a Stage One Complaint had completed. Garwood had neglected to make a substantiated response to the Stage One Complaint position paper sent to her by the Tenant (10 Oct 11).

Denny received a notice that if the Stage Two Complaint did not receive immediate action in accordance with Trust procedures, then the Tenant would file criminal complaints for multiple abuse of process by Knight. Denny did not respond to the Stage Two Complaint; instead, Knight, a pathological liar, started a disingenuous stitch-up to try to displace responsibility for neglect to provide gas maintenance services onto the Tenant. He created a bizarre servicing merry-go-round allegedly to preempt the Stage Two Complaint hearing. [About Psychopaths]

Health and Safety Executive acknowledged receipt of a copy of the Stage Two Complaint (09 Nov 11) and contacted the Trust. At that time, neglect to take action on the complaint and inspect the property had existed for seven months and the Tenant had not had heat or hot water for three months. Knight and Crosthwaite arbitrarily ordered the permanent capping of the gas with the knowledge that the Tenant had already turned it off almost three months before. By that, they confirmed malicious intent.

Subcontractors and Trust employees knew that the Tenant would spend two periods away from the flat for health and safety reasons (35 days from 29 Sep 11 and 25 days from 16 Dec 11). They received that information about his movements from confidential information unlawfully disclosed by Samantha Stanford, a Trust social worker. In the Tenant’s absence, Knight et alia instructed subcontractors to contact him by email and visit the subject flat to create the impression of having tried to provide service and that the Tenant had prevented them by denying access regardless of the fact that he had temporarily vacated the flat.

During the period (29 Sep 11) through the capping (10 Nov 11), most of the time that the Tenant spent away from the apartment, Vulcana Limited an independent gas and oil inspection company pushed a letter through the door of the flat. The letter stated that CDHT had instructed Vulcana to carry out a gas safety and compliance check at the property and that they could not gain entry to the property at the arranged time. It asked the Tenant to contact CDHT to arrange another appointment at a convenient time and date. Vulcana had no appointment and the letter rated as another attempt by the Trust to falsify evidence.

Eight Trust employees and subcontractors contacted or visited the Tenant’s flat without an appointment during that six-week period. They had full knowledge that an inspection could not take place in the absence of the Tenant (the responsible party) and without a gas supply. Those email or telephone contacts and visits only served to harass the Tenant and fabricate evidence to cover-up Trust negligence in not providing gas inspection service during the previous seven months.

In documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, the Tenant found that Garwood had filed a request for a gas check at the flat with Cheshire West & Chester council without sending a copy to the Tenant. She slanted the wording in such a way that council employees could not recognize a problem and would refuse the request. She then entered that rejection as evidence.

When the Tenant returned to the flat, National Grid Gas (NGG) arbitrarily capped the gas (10 Nov 11) which prevented inspection and analysis of the problem by an independent surveyor. The Trust then used the records of the visits in absentia as evidence at a kangaroo court hearing (23 Jan 12). That hearing has now become subject to Cheshire West & Chester Code of Conduct complaints against Councillors who participated in their capacity as former or current Trust directors. [Code of Conduct - Complaint]

Fraudulent Gas Capping

Sarah Banwell, Housing Officer (Anti-social Behaviour), Chester & District Housing Trust (the Trust) conspired with Paul Knight, Assistant Director of Performance and Income and Stuart Crosthwaite, Business Assurance Manager to harass the Tenant. They created an antisocial behaviour scenario using an unlawful stitch-up of an elderly tenant to prevent investigation of faulty gas appliances, flues and voids. That forced him to live in a flat without heat or hot water with attendant risks from noxious fumes which have for seventeen months adversely affected his health and safety also denied him his right to a live-in carer.

Banwell conspired with Ian Doyle, a rogue gas technician employed by National Grid Gas (NGG) and Hamish Laird (an unlicensed Trust employee posing as a gas maintenance engineer) permanently to cap the gas supply. That showed malicious intent to hide evidence of structural defects needed for a Stage Two Complaint hearing. By that, they prevented the Tenant’s independent surveyor from inspecting the property to gather evidence of Trust neglect to stop carbon monoxide emissions and other health and safety risks.

The Tenant needed that inspection and a professional opinion to support an appeal of decisions made by government regulators predicated upon false evidence supplied to them in a consort among Knight, Crosthwaite and Garwood. The Tenant later discovered that Banwell had acted on the orders of Knight and Crosthwaite and gave her three opportunities to mitigate the damage caused by her involvement. She neglected to respond.

 

Chester & District Housing Trust and Health & Safety Executive - Gas Servicing Scam

Gas Appliance and Flue Servicing Fraud

Health & Safety Executive and its subsidiary Gas Safe Register (HSE/GSS) determines the class of worker and experience required for gas engineering purposes. The responsibility moved from CORGI Gas Registration to GSR accountable to HSE (01 Apr 09).

GSR negligence by not following registration and qualification procedures for operatives left a loophole that allowed Sarah Banwell, Housing Officer (Anti-social Behaviour), Chester & District Housing Trust (CDHT) also rogue engineers Hamish Laird (CDHT) and Ian Doyle, National Grid Gas (NGG) to act in an illegal freelance capacity by not presenting searchable licences or personal ID when challenged.

They used out-of-date CORGI registration cards to gain entry to premises then tried to use them to enter the Tenant’s flat in an intimidatory scam organized by Paul Knight, Assistant Director (CDHT) which Geoffrey Podger, Chief Executive and Judith E Hackitt, Board Chair, HSE also Andrew Hutchinson, Long Cycle Work Closure Manager, NGG have since unlawfully condoned.

[Retroactive Preemption and Stitch-Up]

[National Grid Gas - Gas Servicing Fraud]

Gas Operatives - Required Qualifications

  Gas Fraudster  
  Gas Safe Register PIC  
Laird

According to an FOIA/EIR/DPA response from Gas Safe Register, Hamish Laird had none of the following qualifications. However, he worked as a gas operative for about eleven years and had his photograph posted on the GSR website (which suddenly disappead upon filing the FOI/EIR request). Laird still works for the Trust in the same capacity (09 Jul 13).

To legally work on gas appliances in the UK, Isle of Man and Guernsey, a gas operative must hold qualifications which permit Gas Safe Register registration either as an individual or an operative employed by a commercial organisation.

Certification requires prospective gas operatives to complete gas safe courses approved by United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) and to gain on site experience. To register, operatives must hold a recognized qualification for the intended areas of gas work after completing a core gas safety element in each of the seven areas of gas work and before taking any individual appliance assessment.

Appointed as the national accreditation body under the Accreditation Regulations 2009 (SI No 3155/2009) as a non-profit-distributing private company, limited by guarantee, UKAS operates independently under a Memorandum of Understanding with the Government through the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills. It exists as the sole national accreditation body recognized by government to assess organisations that provide certification, testing, inspection and calibration services and for that purpose uses internationally agreed standards. Accreditation by UKAS demonstrates competence, impartiality and performance capability of gas operative evaluators.

UKAS oversees UK Accredited Certification Scheme (ACS) on behalf of Health and Safety Executive (HSE) through seven bodies that certificate assessments throughout the UK. UKAS recognizes ACS as the accepted route for gas operatives to demonstrate and gain a competence qualification prior to seeking certification by Gas Safe Register. ACS certification covers all areas of gas work including domestic, LPG, commercial heating, commercial catering, commercial laundry, meter installation, emergency service provider.

All gas operatives and heating engineers who install, commission and repair gas appliances must hold the relevant ACS qualifications for the areas of work that they undertake. Operatives must earn qualifications under the Accredited Certification Scheme (ACS) regulated by the United Kingdom Accreditation Services (UKAS). These qualifications need to be renewed every five years.

In order to achieve an ACS certificate, the operative needs to pass assessment at a centre approved by BPEC or other accredited certification body. BPEC has developed a series of gas training materials that meet the requirements of the ACS scheme. The basic requirement for Gas Safe Registration includes theoretical and practical proficiency in the following areas:

Gas Engineer – Level 3 Central Heating and Gas Installers Certification

Pipe bending and jointing skills for copper tube to industry standard requirements
Pipe bending and jointing skills for steel pipe to industry standard requirements
Installation and maintenance of cold water storage cistern
Installation and maintenance of hot water cylinder
Installation of central heating radiators and pipework
Install and test steel pipe
Install central heating electrical controls
Installation and maintenance of central heating controls, i.e. pumps and motorized valves
Testing and purging of domestic gas installations
Combustion
Flues and ventilation
Gas pipework
Controls for gas appliances
Gas industry legislation
Installation of domestic gas appliances
Commissioning, servicing and maintenance of domestic gas appliances.

On-site Practical Experience

Following completion of a BPEC or comparable training program, the candidate must work with a Gas Safe registered installer who must observe and sign-off a set number of tasks to complete the candidate’s portfolio.

Those tasks include:

Tightness tests with and without appliances
Tightness test (medium pressure)
Appliance services
Appliance breakdowns
Appliance gas rates (imperial and metric)
Working pressure at meter checks
Standing pressure checks
Spillage tests
Trace and repair gas leak
Flue flow tests
Identify correct ventilation
Visual flue inspections
Working pressure at appliance checks
Appliance re-lights

Before applying for registration by Gas Safe Register, the operative must have achieved ACS qualification in the areas of work requiring registration. The relevant certification authority will then issue a certificate of competence and will download the details to Gas Safe Register for a probationary period for businesses whose registration with CORGI lapsed three years ago.

When Gas Safe Register has poor or no history on the operative it will apply the probationary period as a matter of course. During the probationary period, the operative or employer must notify Gas Safe Register of all gas work they have carried out. Gas Safe Register will then carry out inspections to make sure the work has been completed to the required standards. Upon completion of the ACS assessments, the candidate can then apply for Gas Safe registration or apply for a position with a Gas Safe registered organisation.


 

Health & Safety Executive (HSE) and NGG have still not disclosed whether Doyle acted as an independent contractor or as an employee of National Grid Gas carrying out an official work order initiated by NGG. Rebecca Winter (contacted 11 Nov 11) and Lisa Denman, Customer Support Advisors, Escalated Complaints Team, NGG have spent nine months stonewalling information and withholding documents. They “escalated” a string of disingenuous correspondence which has confused legal issues.

In an attempt to mitigate, NGG elevated the issues to a higher management level. The results of ongoing negotiations will determine whether Doyle, Denman and Winter jointly and severally face criminal complaints or whether NGG mitigates the damage they have allegedly caused and reprimands them within NGG corporate policy. Either way, NGG must release withheld information and documents in a spirit of cooperation and transparency to allow investigation of the Trust by government regulators to proceed.

Banwell acted in violation of the Trust Tenancy agreement and gas regulations when she allowed unidentified individuals to enter the premises. By that, she showed malicious intent. She colluded with Doyle and Hamish in hiding their names and ID numbers and accompanied them in harassment of the Tenant then refused to identify the people who instructed her to organize a stitch-up in an attempt to fabricate evidence that would indict the Tenant.

Government regulators have since released copies of documents (which the Trust filed with them) under the Freedom of Information Act. They support allegations of forgery, neglect of a duty of care and harassment by the Trust and unlawful behavior by Banwell, Doyle and Laird who hold either individual or mutual responsibility to the Tenant under Trust rules and statutes in pari materia (law that deals with the same matter or subject). The gas remains capped (19 Aug 12) pending legal action.

In an unsigned, undated, false and misleading management statement (received 13 Jan 12 from an anonymous source) the Trust stated ambiguously at a panel hearing that: “The panel is recommended to note that the gas supply to the premises was capped by National Gas after notification by the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) to the Trust of a report from the tenant that he believed [that he] had been poisoned by carbon monoxide in the property”.

By that statement, the Trust arguably made HSE responsible for ordering the illegal capping of the gas at the property against objections by the Tenant (the responsible party). The Tenant did not complain that he “had been poisoned by carbon monoxide”; instead, he complained that emissions of carbon monoxide and other noxious gases from several flats caused a recurrence of his reflux condition, tinnitus and vertigo. Moreover, the emissions from other flats had nothing to do with capping the Tenant’s gas supply (10 Nov 11) as the Tenant had already turned off the gas and posted the meter in accordance with Health & Safety Regulations (20 Aug 11). [Public Records Request]

Gas Safety Regulations 1998, #2451, Health and Safety.
Cited as the
Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998
which came into force on 03 October 1998.

Those Regulations apply to Alderney House.
Health and Safety - Stage Two Complaint - CDHT #4536_2011/CCF #880·36·36

The Tenant has turned of the gas at this location and, by law,
nobody must turn it on again until the appliance and flue faults are rectified.

The Regulations require that: if the responsible person for any premises knows or has reason to suspect that gas or carbon monoxide has escaped into those premises, he/she shall immediately take all reasonable steps to cause the supply of gas to be shut off at such place as may be necessary to prevent further emissions. Where an escape of gas has been stopped by shutting off the supply, no person shall cause or permit the supply to be re-opened until all necessary steps have been taken to prevent a recurrence of the emissions.

In this regulation, any reference to an escape of gas from a gas fitting includes a reference to an escape or emission of carbon monoxide gas resulting from incomplete combustion of gas in a gas fitting, but to the extent that this regulation relates to such an escape or emission of carbon monoxide gas, the requirements imposed upon a supplier shall, where the escape or emission is notified to the supplier by the person to whom the gas has been supplied, be limited to advising that person of the immediate action to be taken to prevent such escape or emission and the need for the examination and, where necessary, repair of the fitting by a competent person.

In the Tenant’s presence, Doyle and Laird not only violated tenant rights under the lease but also destroyed personal property despite Tenant objections. The Tenant asked them to show their ID three times; however, Doyle responded with disrespect and threatened the Tenant with police action when the Tenant again insisted on him identifying himself.

Upon further insistence by the Tenant, Doyle identified himself only as “Ian” and continued to refuse to provide his surname then adopted a threatening attitude. Doyle eventually provided a false name and an outdated CORGI registration number to try to placate the Tenant. By that, he showed deliberate intent to deceive. Tenant retired to a safe distance and watched Doyle and Laird vandalize the notice, break the seals on the meter box and cap the gas (10 Nov 11) although he protested three times. The Tenant complained to Carl Sands, Health and Safety Executive who did nothing to rectify the situation.

A transcript obtained under Freedom of Information Act showed that Laird had effectively "made a deal" with Sands by telephone earlier that day arbitrarily to cap the gas allegedly to prevent the surveyor from finding the cause of the carbon monoxide problems. It later transpired that Laird acted as an unqualified gas engineer: a criminal offence. Gas Safe Register has now removed his name from the register.

Antisocial Behaviour

The Trust must not terminate the Tenant’s life-time tenancy without cause; instead, it has attempted to “kill the messenger” for exposing and reporting health and safety risks and unlawful activity by the Trust. Banwell (in a consort with Knight and Crosthwaite) orchestrated a series of harassing circumstances in the hope of a reaction by the Tenant that could construe as antisocial behavior. That would give her grounds for obtaining a police antisocial behavior order.

By that, Banwell used regulations that apply to her duty of care to tenants for malicious purposes by trying to orchestrate an unlawful stitch-up. In fact, the only antisocial behaviour that occurred relates to actions by Knight, Crosthwaite, Banwell, Doyle and Laird. The term “stitch-up” describes an illegal act to incriminate by fabricating evidence and bringing false charges under antisocial behaviour legislation.

Banwell knew that charges of antisocial behavior comprised the only way that the Trust could evict the Tenant and silence his reports of carbon monoxide emissions. Consequently, she tried to orchestrate conditions that would warrant the issue of a police antisocial behavior order (ASBO) against him as evidence which would enable the Trust to evict him. By that, Banwell committed multiple violations of Trust health and safety policy and covered up alleged criminal behavior by Trust executive directors and managers.

The Trust would rather evict the Tenant than spend money to replace appliances and voids to correct carbon monoxide problems. That would leave an unsuspecting replacement tenant, probably a gullible elderly person desperate for accommodation, vulnerable to the same health and safety risks that exist as the result of ongoing non-compliance with gas regulations.

All Trust tenants sign a Tenancy Agreement not to cause nuisance to neighbors in the area or local community. Under that agreement all tenants have a responsibility not only for their own behaviour, but also for the behaviour of visitors who must not cause nuisance or become involved in antisocial behavior on Trust premises or in the surrounding area. Antisocial behavior defines as minor events capable of causing alarm, distress and inconvenience to Trust tenants such as inconsiderate parking or neglect of a garden through to serious acts of harassment or violence. Banwell has arguably committed or orchestrated multiple acts of harassment.

Sarah Banwell - Housing Officer and Undercover Police Agent

  Copper's Nark
   
  Banwell  

During a background check to ascertain the reason for Banwell’s surprise visit to his flat (10 Nov 11), the Tenant discovered that the title of Housing Officer covered up her real function as a copper’s nark. The Chief Superintendent, Cheshire Constabulary “very proudly announced that Sarah Banwell of the Tenancy Action Team was awarded his commendation for her contribution in obtaining the successful possession order and five year anti-social behaviour orders against a family in Blacon”. In another article, he singled out Banwell for the “very professional and thorough manner” in which she presented the case in court. A reasonable person must ask whether covert surveillance and espionage in order to frivolously indict tenants forms part of the official duties for all Trust housing officers and social workers.

Banwell set up a false and misleading strategy to intimidate the Tenant who had filed Stage One and Stage Two Complaints against executive directors and managers to whom she reports. Regardless of the content of those complaints, Banwell allegedly committed criminal acts to protect her supervisors from criminal prosecution. She publicly stated that: “Chester and District Housing Trust works extremely closely with the police and other partner agencies to improve community safety” which further confirms Trust managerial involvement with police officers to the detriment of tenants. The repeated persuasive statements by Knight that the Tenant report him to the police strengthens that assertion.

Banwell stated that Trust executive directors and managers: “were delighted with the success of this initiative in the past and will continue to work with the police in other such initiatives which we believe will have a positive effect on the lives of not only our tenants but other members of our communities”. That defines as an open admission by a Housing Officer that she effectively discloses confidential tenant information protected by the Data Protection Act 1998 to police officers. [Samantha Stanford - WIP]

Banwell’s behavior and that of Samantha Stanford (a Trust social worker who provided confidential information about the Tenant to enable Banwell to plan her stitch-up) shows that Knight and Crosthwaite use Trust employees charged with a duty of care toward tenants to obtain confidential information for malicious purposes.

Garwood confirmed in writing that confidential information about tenants freely circulates without their permission among Trust employees regardless of their employment band. Knight effectively uses that information to alleviate his antisocial personality disorders through the sadistic delight he derives from ridiculing and abusing elderly people. [About Psychopaths]

Unlawful Entry to Trust Premises

The Tenant observed three people from his second-floor flat window remove their ID cards from their necklace card holders before entering the building. They then rang the flat doorbell. Those actions support allegations of joint and several intent to create a condition that could result in malicious antisocial behavior charges against the Tenant without taking responsibility for their actions.

Banwell and two men entered the subject building (10 Nov 11) without the mandated 48 hours notice as required by the Tenancy Agreement or the Tenant’s permission. The Tenant (as the responsible party for the flat and associated appurtenances) refused them entry to the flat because they would not identify themselves or state the purpose of their visit.

By admitting two men unknown to the Tenant into the building without his permission and expecting him to admit them into his apartment without the notice required by the Tenancy Agreement, Banwell violated the rental agreement. When the Tenant requested ID, they all refused to identify themselves or show their ID cards. After constant pressure by the Tenant to reveal their names, Banwell identified herself, one of them gave a false name and they all withheld their ID numbers.

Government regulators later revealed the names of the two men as Ian Doyle, National Grid Gas and Hamish Laird, Chester & District Housing Trust. Laird has still not released his ID# and Gas Safe Register (GSR) will not verify his ID or gas servicing credentials without it. Since that inquiry, GSR has removed Laird’s Trust gas servicing entry and photograph from their web site which indicates that he does not hold gas servicing credentials. Both Doyle and Laird used aliases for their job descriptions while Banwell aided and abetted their deception.

Prior to leaving through the front door, Banwell evidently instructed Doyle permanently to cap the gas supply regardless of objections raised by the Tenant who in law classifies as the responsible first party. The capping had the sole purpose of preventing the Tenant’s structural surveyor from forming a professional opinion and giving evidence at a panel hearing (kangaroo court) which Councillor Rob Thompson chaired. [Kangaroo Court]

While on the premises, Doyle and Laird allegedly committed a series of criminal acts by breaking into the sealed meter box (posted with a warning notice) without permission of the Tenant and capped the gas supply despite the Tenant’s objections. By that, they allegedly took part in a campaign of criminal harassment in violation of the Equality Act 2010. They did not hand the Tenant a certificate that complied with gas regulations.

After spending time together in a Trust van parked on an adjacent property, Doyle and Laird put a forged National Grid Gas certificate through the flat letter box. That certificate contained false and misleading information which included Laird signing as proxy for the Tenant despite his previous objections. He signed as “Heating Services Officer, CDHT” allegedly a false job title. By that, they committed acts which could become subject to serious criminal complaints.

The alleged criminal acts allowed the Trust to hold a fraudulent Stage Two Complaint hearing and to leave the Tenant without heat or hot water for another four winter months. During that period the Trust decided to rewire the premises which additionally left the Tenant without electricity and any means of communication for two days when he could not leave the flat and had no light, heat or hot water. To survive, the Tenant remained fully clothed in bed.

Garwood knew from unlawfully accessing personal information provided by Stanford that the Tenant would not reside at the subject flat for five weeks for health and safety reasons caused by emissions. The Trust knew that engineers would not be admitted to the apartment until an independent structural and gas engineer inspected the premises. However, in desperation they attempted to gain access to the flat by using a stitch-up for the sole purpose of preempting independent inspection and to fudge evidence for a Stage Two Complaint hearing.

Mitigation Attempt

The Trust arbitrarily refused to discuss the Tenant’s offer to mitigate (23 Nov 11):

The mitigation statement gave the Trust an opportunity immediately to install new appliances and make structural repairs to correct ongoing health and safety damage to tenants over a period of eight months and to bring the premises into compliance with the Act (as amended).

1. By immediately capping the gas at #405 to end dangerous carbon monoxide emissions and to end the discriminatory treatment of tenants by capping the gas at #407 but not #405;

2. By prohibiting the tenant at #405 in particular, and other tenants generally, from smoking tobacco anywhere on the premises in accordance with the posted regulations.

3. By giving an undertaking that the Trust will either provide permanent new electric water and radiator heating at flats #403, #405 and #407 within thirty days or replace gas installations at flats #403, #405 and #407 within 30 days with the Baxi Bermuda BBU HE that the Trust tested and claim to have installed in a Melrose Avenue, Chester property.

4. By sealing all flues and voids that presently transmit carbon monoxide and other noxious fumes under the supervision of an independent chartered surveyor regardless of whether electricity or gas fuels the replacement appliances.

Tenant costs in legal and project research to refute the frivolous, vexatious, unsubstantiated assertions used by Trust executive directors and managers to evade their duty of care and legal responsibilities, also the cost of investigating the broadened issues associated with the original complaints, currently amount to more than £83,700.00 (15 Mar 12). That amount does not include compensation for harassment, defamation and reparations for loss of use of a substantial part of the leased flat for almost twelve months and the cost of renting healthy alternative accommodation necessitated by denial of quiet enjoyment of the leased property. [Code of Conduct Complaint]


nota bene (17 Oct 13)

Health & Safety Executive and Gas Safe Register have done nothing to address the issues described in the above article and have left an octogenarian without heat and hot water for 24 months. They have not processed a complaint against the unlicensed gas fitter Hamish Laird (see above panel) who capped the gas and Ian Doyle the National Grid Gas fitter who unlawfully assisted him.

Laird continues to file fraudulent gas certificates although the property has had no gas or inspection in accordance with HSE regulations for almost three years. The Trust has sabotaged attempts by the Tenant to mitigate the damage at his own expense. That covers up HCA and HSE failure to investigate fraud and neglect attributed to the Trust which could construe as multiple misconduct in public office.

A survey among 4,300 private sector tenants (09 May 13) shows an estimated 900,000 people in England now at risk from gas safety hazards. YouGov an international, online market research agency that offers research and market intelligence reports conducted the survey for Shelter, a registered charity that campaigns to end homelessness and bad housing in England and Scotland.

HSE has now brought a case against a landlord and fined her and the gas fitters which is more the exception than the norm.

Essex Landlord fined for employing Illegal Gas Fitters

A landlord has been prosecuted for safety failings relating to illegal and dangerous gas work at two properties in Essex.

Claire Sherwood employed the same illegal gas fitters to install boilers at her own house on Lexden Road, Colchester, on 31 March 2012, and a month later, on 23 April, at a property she owned on Sovereign Crescent, Colchester.

Chelmsford Crown Court heard yesterday (16 October 2013) that an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that Mrs Sherwood, in her role as a landlord of the Sovereign Crescent property, had failed to check that the gas fitters she had employed were competent. She should have ensured they were registered with the Gas Safe Register – a legal requirement for anyone undertaking gas work.

Claire Sherwood, of Lexden Road, Colchester, was fined a total of £950 and ordered to pay £4,000 in costs after being found guilty of breaching Regulation 36(4) of the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998.

The illegal fitters have been sentenced separately for safety failings.

After the hearing, HSE principal inspector Toni Drury said:

“Mrs Sherwood did not do all that was reasonable to ensure those she employed to fit a boiler at her tenanted property were competent and legally allowed to do so. She therefore put the lives of her tenants at risk.

“Every year people die from CO poisoning caused by gas appliances and flues that have not been properly installed or maintained, or that are poorly ventilated. Badly fitted and poorly serviced gas appliances can also cause fires, explosions or gas leaks.

“Unregistered gas fitters do not have the training, knowledge or experience to work on gas fittings safely. They endanger the lives of the public for financial gain, fraudulently avoiding the time and expense of becoming competent and registered.”

“HSE will not hesitate to prosecute those who put lives at risk.”

   

The Big Lie

Russell Kramer, chief executive of Gas Safe Register, added: “Every Gas Safe registered engineer carries a Gas Safe ID card, which shows who they are and the type of gas appliances they are qualified to work on. We always encourage the public to ask for and check the card and if they do have any concerns about the safety of work carried out in their home, to speak to us. Every year we investigate hundreds of reports of illegal gas work.

[Health & Safety Executive]

 

Homes and Communities Agency - Regulation

First and Last

The first batch of eighteen regulatory judgments published by HCA predicates upon the new regulator’s proportionate approach using HCA Regulating Standards. Those standards contain outcomes that the HCA regulator expects providers to achieve classified as either Economic or Consumer and graded for Governance and Viability. The judgments (07 Dec 12) placed Cosmopolitan Housing Group (CHG) comprising Chester and District Housing Trust (CDHT) at the bottom of the list. CHG came in eighteenth with the lowest grades possible: G4 and V4.

G4. The provider does not meet the requirements on governance set out in the Governance and Financial Viability standard. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action.

V4. The provider’s financial viability is of serious concern and it is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action.

[Judgments] [Standards]

Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) took responsibility for the regulation of registered providers of social housing in England (01 Apr 12). It sets a framework that includes standards and regulatory functions within which housing providers must operate.

The Agency focuses on governance, financial viability and value for money as a basis for robust economic regulation to maintain lender confidence and protect taxpayers. It sets consumer standards but leaves the primary responsibility for resolving issues between landlords and tenants at the local level.

HCA only intervenes in cases of serious detriment that have caused, or are likely to cause, harm. A new independent Regulation Committee deals with complaints within its regulatory framework established by the Homes and Communities Agency under the provisions of Localism Act 2011.

 

Inveterate Liar

 
  Knight  
  Slumlord
   
  Denny  

This case study describes one of several attempts by Cosmopolitan Housing Group (CHG) comprising Chester & District Housing Trust (CDHT) "the Trust" executive directors and managers maliciously to incriminate the Tenant. They used kill-the-messenger strategies to silence him and cover up their illegal activity.

The Trust, in a consort with Health & Safety Executive (HSE), denied that a problem existed. By that, they neglected to stop carbon monoxide and other noxious fumes entering from other flats which forced the Tenant, an octogenarian, to live in an uninhabitable flat for 21 months (22 Dec 12).

Unlicensed workers maliciously capped the gas on the alleged instructions of Paul Knight, Group Business Systems and IT Director (CHG) with the tacit approval of Carl Sands (HSE). That left the Tenant without heat and hot water in a flat riddled with noxious gases for 14 months which included two winters with below zero temperatures and with no change in sight (22 Dec 12).

[Retroactive Preemption + Stitch-Up]

Twenty months have elapsed since the Tenant reported (30 Mar 11) serious emission problems into the flat from other flats allegedly through structural carbonation. Tanya Stewart (HSE) and the Trust have used various strategies to evade responsibility to inspect the property which should have occurred within 48 hours.

[Public Records Request]

Section 37 of the Health & Safety Offences Act 2008 allows for the prosecution of any director, executive director or manager of the Trust (or anyone acting in that capacity) where a health and safety offence is committed. This provision targets executive directors and managers who ignore or close their eyes to health and safety risks affecting tenants that they have a duty of care to address in accordance with law.

[Duty of Care]

Court of Appeals asserted as unfair and illogical the rules holding public officers liable for conviction of an offence which do not apply to private sector employees performing public sector duties (eg. employees of housing trusts). Accordingly, the Court quoted from earlier authorities that misconduct in public service must address offences by both public and private sector officers for wilful breach of duty when conduct affronts public sector standards. Trust employees form part of private industry but in fact perform public sector duties.

The Court declined to develop the point or to consider what constituted public office. However, it asserted that the term “public sector employees” includes private sector employees performing public sector duties. By that, if private sector employees breach the public trust, then arguably they should receive similar punishment to public officials especially when statutes predicate upon common law.

[Misconduct in Public Office]

All Trust correspondence and actions that reference appointments for gas appliance inspections at the subject flat (since 20 Aug 11) form part of a retroactive preemption scam that prevented inspection by independent structural and gas engineers. That scam included bizarre attempts to manufacture evidence with intent to displace Trust negligence and malfeasance onto the Tenant at a scheduled hearing.

Last and First

  Propagandist Scam
   
  The Sunday Times - Top 100 Companies 2011  

John Denny, Chief Executive, Cosmopolitan Housing Group comprising Chester & District Housing Trust (the Trust) claimed:

"Being listed in The Sunday Times Top 100 Companies alongside well known high street and boardroom names is a real achievement. To be in the list for four years running and in the Top 30 is a cracking result we can all be really proud of. CDHT's vision is to create opportunity. We place the customer at the heart of the business, listen to our communities and our colleagues and provide training opportunities for all. We've worked hard to make CDHT a great organisation to work with and this award recognises this."

Denny spent £-millions on self-aggrandizing propaganda under the guise of marketing and public relations which contributed to near bankruptcy and neglect to provide critical repairs and maintenance for tenants.

Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) took responsibility for the regulation of registered providers of social housing in England (01 Apr 12). It set a framework that includes standards and regulatory functions within which housing providers must operate. In its first evaluation it placed the Trust at the bottom of the list of eighteen trusts that they investigated with the lowest possible grades.

HCA found that the Trust did not meet the requirements on governance set out in the Governance and Financial Viability standard. It also showed serious concern about the Trust financial viability. HCA claims that issues of serious regulatory concern made the Trust subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action.

Sunday Times - Top 100 Companies finally discovered egg on its face and did not include the Trust in its 2013 awards.

 

Conclusion

Section 37 of the Health & Safety Offences Act 2008 allows for the prosecution of any director, executive director or manager of the Trust (or anyone acting in that capacity) where a health and safety offence is committed. This provision targets executive directors and managers who ignore or close their eyes to health and safety risks affecting tenants that they have a duty of care to address in accordance with law.

The biased and unsubstantiated Stage Two Complaint (kangaroo court) hearing decision by Robert J Thompson, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd., Chair of the Stage Two Complaint hearing and Liberal Democrat Councillor (Hoole), Cheshire West & Chester Council shows another attempt to silence the Tenant.

Thompson claimed that: “The Panel was concerned that you say that you do not currently have hot water and that you acknowledge that your flat is currently being heated by electrical appliances”. Neither the flat nor the water system has heat from electrical appliances. The gas radiators and boiler have had no gas supply since the Tenant turned the supply off (20 Aug 11). He could not turn it back on to facilitate professional structural investigation because of permanent capping of the gas supply by Doyle.

Thompson also claimed: “It is vital that you advise the Trust as to when one of the Trust's engineers can call in order that your gas appliances may be tested and your full facilities restored”. That red herring covers up the fact that the Trust employs no independent gas engineer qualified to inspect and provide evidence to an appeals tribunal about structural deficiency in flues and voids. The Tenant did not complain about his gas appliances; instead, he reported carbon monoxide and other noxious emissions from other flats over which he had no control.

Thompson has now become jointly and severally liable with Trust executive directors and managers in any criminal complaints that the Tenant chooses to file regarding the ongoing harassment and health and safety risks to tenants which violate laws and apply to their duty of care to elderly people. Thompson also has a distinct conflict of interest and should have recused himself in all matters relating to these complaints.
[Duty of Care]

  Alleged Misconduct by Cheshire West & Chester Councillors  
Beckett
(Winsford O&V)
Johnson
(Gowy)
Jones
(Tattenhall)
Thompson
(Hoole)

Wright
(Malpas)

 

The Tenant requested Councillor Eleanor Johnson, Lord Mayor of Chester and Chairman of Council, Conservative Councillor (Gowy), Cheshire West & Chester Council also a Trust board director to commence a public inquiry into the abuse and harassment of elderly tenants who report carbon monoxide emissions in Trust flats and houses. The Tenant also asked Johnson with due diligence to order Thompson and Trust executive officers and managers to cease and desist harassment of the Tenant. She responded with a frivolous one-liner. Thompson must provide copies of the minutes taken at the panel hearing to the Tenant. Those minutes must name panel participants, witnesses, support officer and recorder. Thompson must also provide the minutes and copies of all documents submitted at the panel hearing in accordance with Council mandates. He has ignored a deadline set by the Tenant (10 Feb 12) to comply with standards set by Cheshire West & Chester Council. [Due Diligence]

Johnson referred the issues to Mike Jones, Leader of the Council who also responded with insolence. All three Councillors must now answer a Chester West & Cheshire Council, Code of Conduct complaint. Councillor Ann Wright terminated her appointment as a Trust board director (22 Feb 12) following the filing of that complaint (20 Feb 12).
[Code of Conduct - Complaint]

Duty of Care

Neglect by the Trust to provide maintenance services and to repair faulty gas appliances and flues to stop emission of carbon monoxide and other noxious fumes into living accommodation have made the Tenant’s flat virtually unhabitable. Those emissions, and other unacceptable living conditions, have caused deterioration of the health of the Tenant (who reaches the age of 80 next year). The strain upon the Tenant of continuing to fight for his human rights for almost a year have had an adverse affect on his health and welfare. Effectively, Trust executive directors and managers have tried to kill the messenger to silence the message which contains details of their alleged neglect and criminal activity.

At the time of writing, the Tenant must confine all his activity to the least polluted room in the flat with the windows on both sides of the building open to create a through draft that reduces pollution which emanates from the flat below. This condition has become even more serious now that temperatures have dropped to below zero. The Trust has challenged his right to habitable living accommodation guaranteed by law which has reduced him to living and sleeping in one room without heat (apart from a small fan electric heater) and hot water while eating food that does not require cooking.

Knight and Crosthwaite (as proxies for Denny) have maliciously caused a virtually uninhabitable condition for the Tenant which he has to frequently vacate to mitigate damage to his health. They refused to provide service and maliciously and unlawfully capped the gas to prevent inspection of appliances and voids by qualified structural and gas engineers which would document the state of disrepair. They then filed false and misleading reports with Health and Safety Executive to cover up alleged criminal activity.

The Trust has now brought about a situation that allows publication of details of this denial of human rights in the public domain. Hopefully, dissemination of that information will warn other elderly people and families about the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning and other health and safety risks that currently exist in 1000 Trust flats.

The articles will also make the public aware of the harassment and bullying that accompanies attempts by Trust executive directors and managers to silence tenants who make complaints. Tenants live in fear of eviction when the Trust uses threats of antisocial behaviour orders based upon trumped-up charges to try to silence and evict them.

The Trust and private landlords have a duty of care to tenants (required by Health and Safety Executive) to act immediately upon receipt of a report of a dangerous gas condition. In this case, the condition has existed since the Tenant took occupancy and The Trust has not addressed the complaint since the filing more than sixteen months ago.

The Trust has not exercised due diligence (a legally binding process under the Chester & District Tenancy Agreement) by inquiring into the environmental characteristics of the property. The Trust did not verify information and documentation provided by the Tenant in order to facilitate a decision as to the urgency for gas maintenance and repairs to take place. Instead, Trust employees ridiculed, harassed and bullied the Tenant. They arbitrarily made a decision to deny service by falsely stating that they had inspected the building and found no fault. No inspection has taken place since the filing of the complaint. [Tenant Case Study]

About the Author

Paul Trummel has written hundreds of articles on corporate, trade union, senior and academic abuse also institutionalized racism. He founded Contra Cabal (one of the first electronic magazines to appear on the web) for which he develops the site, writes articles, designs pages, and produces graphics.

Published in print since 1944 and on the web since 1992, without a single legitimate challenge to the authenticity of his reporting, he has spent sixty years as an investigative journalist and graphic designer, twenty years as a new media industry CEO and systems designer-consultant, and thirty years as a post-graduate professor teaching computer industry executives working on masters or doctoral degrees as students of journalism, law, and graphic design. He has attended or chaired hundreds of academic committee meetings and organized international conventions. [More About the Author]

Prepublication Notice

Individuals featured in Contra Cabal receive prior notice in accordance with international codes of ethics agreed among journalists. Several of those codes have international legal precedent. They have an opportunity to mitigate damage and to refute statements that could negatively affect their reputations or cause investigation or prosecution of them for alleged illegal acts.

The notices give them an opportunity to challenge with substantiated evidence any charges affecting their ethical or moral character. For public accountability, the author encourages them to respond in open exchange before a deadline. Individuals mentioned incidentally receive a copy of the notice as a courtesy.

Journalists must report the truth no matter whom they offend and with disregard for the consequences of publication. Accurate reporting predicates a higher purpose and the common good.

The author does not solicit personal opinions and informs individuals that they should address only matters of fact. The notices declare personal or conflicting interests that relate to topics or to opinion especially when the content draws upon advocacy, experience, conclusion, or interpretation and advise of a responsibility to gather information and develop public awareness about wrongdoing and violation of codes of conduct.

Primarily, the articles expose malfeasance and misuse of public funds also abuse of elderly tenants by landlords, trust officials and law enforcement agencies. Named individuals neglected to adhere to their duty of care. Some maliciously damaged others and their reputations by libel, slander, assault, or other unlawful acts. No person receives immunity from investigation. Anything published results from investigation, verification and validation which takes into account violations of law or breach of established rules and ethical practices.

Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd.

John Denny, Paul Knight and Stuart Crosthwaite have, in an alleged conspiracy to defraud the Tenant, refused to provide public information about public sector employees. Crosthwaite refused in writing (05 Dec 11) to provide job titles and job descriptions of specific staff members and supervisors although the Trust previously published a chart containing the names and job titles of Trust officials. By that, they enabled several officials and staff members to use aliases and false or misleading job descriptions and proxies in a conspiracy to defraud in violation of the Fraud Act 2006. Section 2 includes fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information and fraud by abuse of position.

The author requested information about Trust officials, staff members and direct supervisors to complete validation and verification of content which alleges criminal acts in order to hold other officials and staff members harmless. Trust officials prevented that process. To partly overcome the withholding of public information, the author has listed the people named in the articles and their false or misleading titles. The supervisors of the staff members committing criminal acts remain unknown; however, they become jointly and severally liable for the acts of their subordinates.

Protagonists

Listed in alphabetical order due to unlawful withholding by Trust officials of seniority or status. None of the protagonists responded to the three opportunities to mitigate sent to each of them.

Sarah Banwell, Housing Officer (Anti-Social Behaviour).
Susan C Bramley, Deputy Chief Executive and Company Secretary
Lynne Britton, Gas Servicing Administrator.
Paul Burton, In-House Solicitor.
Stuart Crosthwaite, Business Assurance Manager.
John Denny, Chief Executive.
Paul Finch, Assistant Director Major Works and New Business.
Wendy Garwood, Satisfaction and Complaints Officer.
Karen Heritage, Performance and Quality Team.
Paul Knight, Assistant Director of Performance and Income.
Philip Jones, Director of Property Services.
Hamish Laird - Fraudulent User-Friendly Aliases used by Laird:
M&E Surveyor; Gas Engineer; Heating Services Officer
; Estates Manager.
Samantha Stanford, Visiting Support Officer (Social Worker).

Board of Directors

Forty board directors have resigned during the decade since incorporation. Twenty-two of those resignations (which include six terminations) occurred on the watch of John Denny, Chief Executive. The Trust now claims that it has ten Board Directors: four independent, three nominated by Cheshire West & Chester Council and three tenant directors; however, the company register shows only eight registered board directors (10 Dec 11). Denny has ignored repeated requests to explain these phenomena.

Jacqueline C Grannell, Independent, former school governor.
William S Hogg, Independent, Non-Executive Local Area Chairman, Yorkshire Bank.
Eleanor Johnson, Lord Mayor of Chester, Chairman of the Council, Conservative (Gowy)
(formerly director Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd.
now a director of the partner Cosmopolitan Housing Trust Ltd.)
Mike Jones, Leader of the Council, Conservative (Tattenhall) (former Director).
Lindsay McAllister, Independent, Consultant, Housing Regeneration and Business Dev.
Patrick Scanlan, Tenant, former school teacher.
Jane S Stephens, Independent, Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
Alexandra Tate, Labour Councillor (Lache), Cheshire West & Chester Council.
Robert J Thompson, Liberal Democrat Councillor (Hoole), Cheshire West & Chester Council.
(now a director of both Chester & District Housing Trust Ltd.
and the partner Cosmopolitan Housing Trust Ltd.)
Ann Wright, Conservative Councillor (Malpas), Cheshire West & Chester Council.

Regulatory Authorities

Due to fraud, harassment and neglect by the Trust to follow its own complaint procedures (on an issue that initially classified as a simple gas appliance servicing request), the Tenant has filed and/or initiated disciplinary and/or regulatory proceedings with the following authorities.

Cheshire West & Chester Council, Simon Goacher, Monitoring Officer.
The Tenant asserted that all the parties named in a complaint classified as Members of Cheshire West & Chester Council. He expressed the complaint with particularity and provided copies of all relevant documents for consideration by the Assessment Sub-Committee and filed a written complaint in accordance with published Council procedures.

Gas Safe Register, Paul Johnston, Chief Executive.
The official list of gas engineers registered to work safely and legally on gas appliances in United Kingdom.

Health and Safety Executive, Carl Sands, Gas Officer.
The executive has a duty of care to prosecute duty holders that have flouted the law and/or shown reckless disregard for health and safety requirements.

National Grid Gas, Lisa Denman, Adviser, Customer Support, Escalated Complaints.
National Grid owns and manages the grids for energy sources. In UK it run systems that deliver gas and electricity across the entire country and is responsible for the health and safety of delivery systems and the discipline of its gas engineers.

Tenant Services Authority, Simon Wadsworth, Advisor, Regulatory Enquiries.
The independent regulator for affordable housing in England with a duty to improve the standard of service for tenants and residents.

The Chartered Institute of Building, James Hirst, Professional Conduct Manager.
The Institute investigates allegations of professional misconduct as set out in CIOB Bye-Laws and other regulations.

Impending Complaints

Housing Ombudsman Service (HOS).
The Housing Act 1996 (amended by the Housing & Regeneration Act 2008) requires all social housing providers to belong to the Service. It includes all providers registered with the Tenant Services Authority. The law sets out the Ombudsman’s power to investigate complaints and to determine what is fair in all the circumstances of the case. The Ombudsman looks at complaints after the final stage of a Trust complaint process or when the Trust has abused that process.

Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).
The IPCC was established by the Police Reform Act and became operational in April 2004. Investigates the most serious complaints and allegations of misconduct against the police in England and Wales, as well as handling appeals from people who are not satisfied with the way police have dealt with their complaint.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) regulates solicitors in England and Wales.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
The statutory body established under the Equality Act 2006 now exists as the independent advocate for equality and human rights in UK.


  Stephen James Mosley, Conservative Member of Parliament for City of Chester
   
 


Cheshire Phat Cat addressing virtually nobody about nothing in the House of Commons.
He had nothing to say, he said it and worse he read it.

Mosley used absolute lies authored by Knight, a proven pathological liar, to intimidate his constituent.
That detracted from a public inquiry which he has delayed for 30 months.
By that, he allegedly perverted the course of justice.

 
Roll of Dishonour - Nothing Succeeds like Excess


Unlawful Hacking, Prior Restraint and Internet Denial-of-Service Attacks by Public Officials

Internet Denial-of-Service attacks (DoS) attempt to make an application or network resource unavailable to intended users. The means, motives and targets for the attacks vary. They generally consist of efforts by one or more people to temporarily or indefinitely interrupt or suspend services of a host connected to the Internet. DoS attacks violate the acceptable use policies of virtually all Internet service providers and violate laws of individual nations.

[Nothing Succeeds like Excess]

International laws and judicial decisions have determined an absolute right for individuals to distribute information freely. Censorship must not subserve economic considerations or political expedience. Moreover, use of technical communication constitutes a right not a privilege despite technocratic claims to the contrary.

Hacking not only empowers systems administrators to implement frivolous email complaints by arbitrarily removing computer access it also allows them to censor or manipulate individually addressed incoming mail: an outrageous invasion of personal privacy. If they disagree with content, then they often predicate that dissent upon disclosure of their own malfeasance. Interference with email transmission proscribed by international law classifies as a serious criminal offence in most democratic countries.

Public officials used electronic prior restraint in attempts to censor Contra Cabal media releases and other information from specified disseminators. That removed the right of recipients to know about alleged crimes that could affect their employment. Without a court order permitting prior restraint, they effectively committed a crime. If media release recipients wish to opt-out, then they can reply and ask to unsubscribe. If they contest the content, then they have an alternative remedy by writing a letter to the editor using the link provided.

The public officials named and shamed in the Roll of Dishonor have allegedly committed misconduct in public office by Internet hacking. They have censored personally addressed, incoming, non-commercial, email and media releases by installing unlawful content filtering applications on their servers. They identified specific character strings then arbitrarily deleted email content which constituted an illegal prior restraint: hacking that interferes with the free flow of information guaranteed by laws. By that, they committed illegal censorship of free speech to prevent publication or broadcast of particular information.

Gagging by public officials permits bureaucratic self-vindication. Use of filters should only apply when content requires parental control, contains pornography, provokes violence or promotes hate. However, they used electronic prior restraint to censor media releases and other information from specified disseminators. That removed the right of recipients to know about alleged crimes and information that could protect them from harassment. Without a court order permitting prior restraint, public officials committed crimes which construe as misconduct in public office.

Public sector information technology (IT) officers frequently act upon an irrational expectation that certain categories of email may contain something that they (or their supervisors) do not wish others to read then arbitrarily reject it by hacking. They have a natural fear of dissent and have an aversion to controversy. Their addiction to political correctness frequently causes them to invoke censorship of Internet activities.

All Internet hackers will be reported to Police Central e-crime Unit (PCeU) and their names will appear on the Roll of Dishonor. They will also become subject to impending charges for misconduct in public office.

Roll of Dishonor - Public Sector Internet DoS Attacks - Unlawful Filtering

Andrew D Cross, Chairperson, U3A Chester, UK.
Jennifer M Carley, Trustee, U3A NW Region, UK.
Simon Goacher, Weightmans LLP (former Head of Legal and Democratic Services, CW&CC), UK.
Rt Revd Graham James, Bishop of Norwich and former HM Consul David Charles Broom, UK.
Douglas G Houser, Senior Counsel, Bullivant Houser Bailey, Portland and Seattle, US.
Paul Knight, Group Business Systems & IT, Cosmopolitan Housing Group, Chester, UK.
Maureen L Mitchell, Summit Law Group (Director, Council House), Seattle, US.
Michelle Stanistreet, General Secretary, National Union of Journalists, UK.

Roll of Dishonor - Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) - Misconduct in Public Office

Christopher S Graham, Information Commissioner (ICO)

If all requests for names of ICO employees are not met before Saturday 4 September 2013, then the home addresses and names of cohabitants will be published to meet a journalism duty of care to namesakes. Those employees wishing to avoid disclosure of their home address can meet their employment commitment (under paragraph 9 below and itemized in the FOIA request) by providing the information that personally relates to them using the Letters to the Editor panel at:

http://016b51c.netsolhost.com/letter_11.html

Approximately twenty FOIA/EIR/DPA requests, submitted during the past 18 months, concern alleged criminal activity and misconduct in public office by Health & Safety Executive (HSE) and Homes & Communities Agency (HCA) which have not been adequately reviewed by ICO employees.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/employee_information_ico/new

Christopher S Graham, Information Commissioner (ICO) has denied requests for names of officials by making an arbitrary decision without any standing in law and contrary to his ICO mandate:

9. Providing your Name to Customers

We aim to be as open as possible and staff would normally be expected to provide their full name and department over the telephone. However, if you are taking enquiries from members of the public and are concerned about giving your full name because of the specific behaviour of a particular customer, you may give only your first name and department. Mention any such instances and the reason for withholding your last name to your line manager. Under no circumstances should a member of ICO staff refuse to provide any name to a customer. If a customer indicates that they are not happy that you have not provided your full name, provide your line manager's full name and give details of the service complaint procedure. On letters or emails, full names and direct dial telephone numbers should always be provided, unless agreed in exceptional circumstances by line manager with a note added to the case.

The following disingenuous statement by Graham will be ignored. Executives must not lawfully take responsibility for alleged criminal activities by ICO staff members.

For the avoidance of doubt we are in no way seeking to limit your ability to comment freely and openly about the work of the Information Commissioner's Office. We are however requesting that you focus your comments on the actions of the Commissioner's office and not the individual members of staff. Should you wish to attribute the actions of my office to a named individual you should view me, as Information Commissioner, as that person. I also note your response to our refusal under section 14 of the Freedom of Information Act to provide you with further information about members of my staff. This refusal was sent to you by my Information Governance department. In your response you ask for the name of the person who made this decision and for the decision to be reviewed. . . .

These ICO employees form part of a team handling overdue FOIA/EIR/DPA requests. Some of them have set up disingenuous stratagems that arguably construe as criminal when considering Freedom of Information Act 2000, Section 77 and laws in pari materia which address misconduct in public office.

The Author awaits a response to a request for legal disclosure information about the listed individuals so that he can properly evaluate individual culpability prior to elevating the issues to The Information Rights Tribunal, now part of the First-Tier Tribunal in the General Regulatory Chamber (First-Tier Tribunal/Information Rights).

The sooner ICO responds to the FOI request, the sooner clarification by the Author will allow him to name and shame the guilty and vindicate the innocent as part of his duty of care to separate the sheep from the goats.

[Employee Information]

Andrew White
Christopher Sidney Matthew Graham (DOB 21 September 1950).
605 Beaumont Building, Mirabel Street, Greater Manchester M3 1DV.

Dinah Balsillie
Graham Watson
Louise Mottershead
Mary Morgan
Noel Mullarkey
Pamela C Clements (Age 50-54).
3 Stanhope Close, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 2NN.
Cohabitants: David J Clements, Rebecca E Clements, Alexander P Clements, Andrew W Clements.

Philip Hesford
Rachael M Cragg (Age 30-34).
19 Home Farm Avenue, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 3QW.

Cohabitant: Robert J Cragg.
Richard Sisson
Steven Dickinson
Trevor Craig, et alia

[Letters to the Editor]

Paul Trummel, Professor Emeritus
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Contra Cabal Foundation Limited.

 

Logotype

Copyright 2013 by Paul Trummel
All Rights Reserved: 12-Feb-2012
Edition: 880-37-35/2013-10-21 20:46
Letters to the Editor: Submit